We have been doing some housekeeping, listed below. When changes are made in ZINC, exported subsets will only be corrected if they were exported after Sept 8, 2009.
= ZINC =
1. We found and fixed 64 ZINC entries with incorrect protonation of triaminopyrimidines.
2. We found 112 ZINC entries with incorrectly protonated arylhydrazines: [NH3+][NH]a. We deleted these completely from ZINC, and have reloaded them, so they now have new ZINC IDs. We regret this, but it was the only practical way.
"Automated docking screens: a feasibility study" has appeared at J Med Chem, ASAP.
Here is the link: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm9006966
We hope you find it interesting and look forward to discussing with you.
We revoked 12M ZINC compounds from Pubchem this week. We thought you might like to know more about this. If so, read on...
We are holding an automated docking party to celebrate the release of DOCK Blaster on 9/9/9. Free docking for everyone, and some free beer too.
docking.org will be rebooted Friday evening circa 5.30pm - 6.30 pm local time.
Everything will stop cold for up to an hour while we upgrade our equipment.
Thank you for your interest, support, and patience.
The Community Structure Activity Resource at Michigan University starts its first public challenge tonight at midnight. We've already booked our tickets on the bullet train from Tokyo airport so we can be among the first to savor the "PDB nouveau". There will be a session at the spring ACS in San Francisco in 2010 to discuss this. If you want to participate, you need to submit by Oct 5, so don't just sit there.
Please take a look at their website, http://csardock.org/ and see what you think of it.
My News and Views about Scaffold Hunter and Scaffold Tree appeared this week in Nature Chemical Biology.
The Wetzel paper on Scaffold Hunter is here:
If you haven't checked out this software yet, take a look. I am particularly happy that they GPL'd the code. http://scaffoldhunter.sourceforge.net/. Congratulations to Stefan and Co. !
We are making many improvements to DOCK Blaster. Recently, we introduced a new color-coded preliminary docking assessment table that aims to provide a yes/maybe/no answer to the question: Should I continue with docking. We thank the referees of our paper for prompting us to bring this forward.
Have you run a docking campaign, including purchasing compounds and testing them, only to find that nothing worked? What do you think went wrong? Do you think you could have done better if you had done things differently, or do you believe the project was doomed from the start?
I am interested in hearing from you. You can reply to this blog post, or you can write to me privately at jji at cgl dot ucsf dot edu. It does not have to be long. I am looking for stories of failure, with the aim of learning how to make docking better.
I hope to hear from you!